Skip Navigation
Testimony

Testimony on the Arizona Partisan Review before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform

Gowri Ramachandran, senior counsel, testified before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform about the Arizona partisan review and the risk it poses to our democracy.

October 7, 2021
October 7, 2021

On October 7, Gowri Ramachandran, senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice, testified before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform about the Arizona partisan review and efforts to sabotage our elections and our democracy. 

The Arizona Senate’s partisan review, and specifically the contractors who are conducting the review, fail to meet any of the basic standards that legitimate election audits should meet in order to earn confidence from the public: objectivity, transparency, and competence. Instead, the contractors’ most attention-grabbing findings fit the pattern that purveyors of voter fraud myths have long followed: they remain ignorant of basic probability, common election laws, and common election administration procedures.1 They then raise baseless suspicions about their fellow citizens2 and the dedicated public servants who administer elections.3

By seeding disinformation campaigns about elections, these partisan reviewers are laying the groundwork for future sabotage of our democracy. Recent efforts to pass laws that would permit state legislatures to overturn election results have failed,4 but the continued spread of lies about elections set the stage for legitimating these efforts in the future. And these partisan reviews that continue to fuel the “Stop the Steal” movement have been spreading.5 Political actors in other states have proposed conducting their own partisan reviews, and many are treating the Arizona Senate’s venture as a model.6

Congress should provide resources to help and protect election officials from retaliation for ensuring eligible voters can exercise their rights. Through the Freedom to Vote Act, it should protect election workers during the vote tabulation process and require (and fund) legitimate post-election tabulation audits. Finally, by providing voters a remedy if their right to vote (and have that vote counted) in a federal election is infringed, the Act would protect against the danger of a state legislature or election official succumbing to future attempts to sabotage an election.