Skip Navigation
Resource

State Voter Suppression Effort Is Highly Partisan

The harshest voter suppression bills enacted this year have been introduced and enacted in starkly partisan fashion by Republican legislatures and governors.

Published: June 11, 2021

Below, we analyze the partisan break­down of the 24 state laws restrict­ing access to voting this year (enacted as of June 3, 2021). foot­note1_330zhm6 1 Those laws include: AL H.B. 285, AL H.B. 538, AR H.B. 1112, AR H.B. 1244, AR H.B. 1715, AR S.B. 643, AZ S.B. 1003, AZ S.B. 1485, FL S.B. 90, GA S.B. 202, IA S.F. 413, ID H.B. 290, IN S.B. 398, KY H.B. 574, KS H.B. 2183, KS H.B. 2332, MT H.B. 176, MT H.B. 530, MT S.B. 169, MT S.B. 196, OK H.B. 2663, NV S.B. 84, WY H.B. 75, UT H.B. 12.  Over­all, we find that these new laws were enacted as part of an over­whelm­ingly partisan Repub­lican push. Repub­lic­ans intro­duced and drove virtu­ally all of the bills that impose new voting restric­tions, and the harshest new laws were passed with almost exclus­ively Repub­lican votes and signed into law by Repub­lican governors. The few bills that received Demo­cratic support are gener­ally less restrict­ive.

Twenty-two of the twenty-four restrict­ive laws were intro­duced and sponsored by Repub­lic­ans or Repub­lican-led commit­tees. The two laws that included Demo­cratic co-spon­sors impose relat­ively modest voting restric­tions. (Those are an Oklahoma law, H.B. 2663, that contains provi­sions that both expand and restrict voting access, and a Nevada law, S.B. 84, that expands permiss­ible precinct sizes.)

Sixteen of the most restrict­ive policies enacted this year, in nine states, were passed on strict party-line or near party-line votes. The only substan­tially restrict­ive bill to receive Demo­cratic votes was enacted in Arkan­sas, where three other severely restrict­ive laws passed on strict party-line votes. In other words, more than 90 percent of the most signi­fic­ant voting restric­tions were enacted along party lines, and all of the states with the most restrict­ive new laws had strict party-line votes. 

There are a hand­ful of new laws contain­ing provi­sions that make it harder to vote that received some Demo­cratic support. foot­note2_bq4n5jg 2 See AL H.B. 538 (shortens the applic­a­tion absentee ballot dead­line by two days); AR H.B. 1244 (estab­lishes that non-photo IDs are no longer valid for voter iden­ti­fic­a­tion); AR S.B. 643 (shortens the window for in-person return of mail ballots and applic­a­tion for mail ballots, and appears to ban use of drop boxes); ID H.B. 290 (creates new signa­ture match­ing proced­ures for absentee ballots); NV S.B. 84 (increases the maximum number of active voters permiss­ible in a voting precinct); UT H.B. 12 (requires cross-refer­en­cing of death certi­fic­ates against voter regis­tra­tion rolls as the basis for purging, without notice to the voters being removed, audit­ing of the source data, and or match­ing criteria). Mixed bills with restrict­ive and expans­ive provi­sions include: IN S.B. 398 (limits the use of drop boxes for absentee voting, but also expands the abil­ity to return an absentee ballot on behalf of another, provides a notice and cure process for absentee ballots, and makes voting easier for indi­vidu­als with disab­il­it­ies); KY H.B. 574 (shortens the absentee ballot applic­a­tion period, restricts who can assist in return­ing absentee ballots, and creates a purge process that appears to viol­ate federal law; also codi­fies the use of drop boxes and a notice and cure process for signa­ture mismatches, creates an online absentee ballot request portal, and estab­lishes no-excuse early voting on the Thursday, Friday, and Saturday before Elec­tion Day); OK H.B. 2663 (shortens the absentee ballot request period, but also adds one addi­tional day in-person absentee voting, and one addi­tional hour of in-person absentee voting on the Saturday before Elec­tion Day). Three of those laws are mixed, mean­ing they contain a number of policies that also expand voter access (in Kentucky, Oklahoma, Indi­ana). And for four of those laws, the restric­tions are much more modest than the other voter suppres­sion laws enacted this year (in Alabama, Idaho, Nevada, and Utah).

On the whole, our analysis shows that Repub­lic­ans have led the most strin­gent and aggress­ive efforts to limit Amer­ic­ans’ access to the ballot box this year, and this push has been nearly unilat­eral, with little to no Demo­cratic support.

End Notes