Skip Navigation
Court Case Tracker

Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina

On September 22, the League of Women Voters filed suit to challenge North Carolina’s 2016 remedial congressional map as a partisan gerrymander.

Published: June 27, 2019

Note: The Bren­nan Center is not a parti­cipant in this case.

Case Back­ground

League of Women Voters v. Rucho is the most recent chal­lenge to North Caro­lin­a’s remedial congres­sional map, which was enacted earlier this year. The plaintiffs argue that the map viol­ates the 1st and 14th Amend­ments and consti­tutes a partisan gerry­mander. 

The three-judge panel hear­ing the case denied the state’s motion to dismiss on March 3, 2017 and consol­id­ated the case with trial Common Cause v. Rucho

On June 26, 2017 the legis­lat­ive defend­ants filed a motion to stay the case pending the Supreme Court’s final decision in Gill v. Whit­ford, which the plaintiffs opposed. The court denied the state’s motion to stay and the trial took place from Octo­ber 16–19, 2017. 

On Janu­ary 9, 2018 the court struck down the map as an uncon­sti­tu­tional partisan gerry­mander and blocked the state from using the plan for future elec­tions. The court direc­ted that the North Caro­lina legis­lature be given until Janu­ary 24 to adopt a remedial plan and direc­ted that any such plan be filed with the court by Janu­ary 29. Because of upcom­ing elec­tion dead­lines, the court also ordered that the parties propose special masters to redraw the map in the event the court rejects any legis­lat­ively enacted remedial map. 

On Janu­ary 11, the legis­lat­ive defend­ants filed an emer­gency motion to stay the remedial map draw­ing process pending the Supreme Court’s decisions in Gill v. Whit­ford and Benisek v. Lamone. On Janu­ary 16, the court denied the defend­ants’ emer­gency motion to stay. 

On Janu­ary 12, the legis­lat­ive defend­ants filed an emer­gency applic­a­tion with the Supreme Court asking the court to stay proceed­ings at the district court pending appeal. On Janu­ary 18, the Court issued an order stay­ing the district court’s decision, includ­ing the remedial map process, pending appeal. 

On June 25, the Court vacated and remanded the case for further consid­er­a­tion in light of Gill v. Whit­ford.

On August 27, the three-judge panel issued a new opin­ion, ruling for the plaintiffs on both their First and 14th Amend­ment claims. 

On August 31, the legis­lat­ive defend­ants filed a motion to stay the opin­ion pending Supreme Court review. On Septem­ber 12, the panel gran­ted that motion. 

On Janu­ary 4, 2019, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the legis­lat­ive defend­ants’ appeal. The Court heard oral argu­ment on March 26.

On June 27, 2019, the Court vacated the decision below and remanded the case for dismissal, hold­ing that partisan gerry­man­der­ing claims are nonjus­ti­ciable.

Docu­ments

District Court (Initial Proceed­ings, 2016–2018)

U.S. Supreme Court (First Appeal)

Emer­gency Applic­a­tion for Stay

Juris­dic­tional Stage

District Court (on remand)

U.S. Supreme Court (Second Appeal)

Juris­dic­tional Stage

Merits Stage

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Appel­lants

Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Appellees