Skip Navigation
  • Home
  • Our Work
  • Analysis & Opinion
  • Task Force on Abuses of Power by Executive Branch Proposes Solutions to Stop Violations of Scientific Integrity and Misuses of Presidential Appointments
Press Release

Task Force on Abuses of Power by Executive Branch Proposes Solutions to Stop Violations of Scientific Integrity and Misuses of Presidential Appointments

Co-Chaired by Preet Bharara and Christine Todd Whitman, the Nonpartisan Group Proposes Legislative Reforms to Protect Government Science and Fill Executive Branch Positions with Qualified People

October 3, 2019
Contact: Alexandra Ringe, Media Contact,, 646-925-8744

New York, NY – A nonpar­tisan task force of eight former govern­ment offi­cials from both Repub­lican and Demo­cratic admin­is­tra­tions released a report today examin­ing two crit­ical func­tions of the federal govern­ment that have been hobbled by abuses in the exec­ut­ive branch: object­ive scientific research, and the appoint­ments process used to fill senior admin­is­tra­tion posi­tions. 

The National Task Force on Rule of Law & Demo­cracy, led by former U.S. attor­ney Preet Bhar­ara and former New Jersey governor and EPA admin­is­trator Christine Todd Whit­man, proposes legis­lat­ive reforms to rein­force the norms and unwrit­ten rules that once ensured that these govern­ment func­tions were carried out without excess­ive politi­ciz­a­tion. The task force is a project of the Bren­nan Center for Justice at NYU Law.

“The Trump pres­id­ency has high­lighted pres­sure points in Amer­ican demo­cracy where rules and norms are not strong enough to stop abuses of power,” said task force co-chair Preet Bhar­ara. “It’s long past due for Congress to take action to rein­force these rules and prevent these abuses going forward.”

The task force’s report contains an extens­ive digest of recent pres­id­en­tial admin­is­tra­tions’ viol­a­tions of scientific integ­rity, includ­ing restrict­ing public access to data and retali­at­ing against govern­ment research­ers for their scientific conclu­sions.

“Sharpie­Gate is just one of many examples of recent pres­id­en­tial admin­is­tra­tions distort­ing the work of scient­ists,” said task force co-chair Christine Todd Whit­man. “When exec­ut­ive branch offi­cials alter or suppress govern­ment data and research, it can jeop­ard­ize the public’s safety and impede our nation’s economic progress. Scientific research by the federal govern­ment has led to safer road and air travel, life-saving drugs, and so much more. We must protect its inde­pend­ence and integ­rity.”

Incid­ents of pres­id­en­tial admin­is­tra­tions hinder­ing govern­ment science include:

  • An aide in the George W. Bush White House who was a former oil industry lobby­ist edited govern­ment reports to down­play links between carbon emis­sions and climate change. 
  • EPA offi­cials in the Obama admin­is­tra­tion tried to change the exec­ut­ive summary of a draft public report on the impact of frack­ing on drink­ing water, minim­iz­ing the risks. 
  • During the Trump admin­is­tra­tion, after EPA research­ers produced a study show­ing economic bene­fits to protect­ing wetlands from pollu­tion, aides to the agency’s admin­is­trator told them to produce a new study show­ing no such bene­fits.

To address such prob­lems, the task force calls on Congress to pass legis­la­tion that would, among other things:

  • Create scientific integ­rity stand­ards at exec­ut­ive agen­cies
  • Prohibit polit­ic­ally motiv­ated manip­u­la­tion or suppres­sion of research
  • Increase public access to govern­ment research and data 

In its exam­in­a­tion of the hiring process for senior admin­is­tra­tion posi­tions, the task force analyzes the impacts of a dysfunc­tional system: increas­ing numbers of jobs that are vacant, filled with acting offi­cials, or filled with indi­vidu­als appoin­ted largely due to partisan or personal ties rather than qual­i­fic­a­tions. 

The task force proposes legis­la­tion that would make it harder for pres­id­ents to side­line the Senate’s role as a check on the process for filling senior posi­tions. The group also recom­mends laws to fix the back­logged White House secur­ity clear­ance process and stream­line the confirm­a­tion process for exec­ut­ive branch nomin­ees, among other reforms. 

Today’s report is the second to be published by the task force. The first was released in Octo­ber 2018 and proposed legis­la­tion related to improper inter­fer­ence by pres­id­en­tial admin­is­tra­tions in law enforce­ment invest­ig­a­tions and conflicts of interest in the White House. Click here to read the group’s first report.  
The members of the National Task Force on Rule of Law & Demo­cracy are:

  • Preet Bhar­ara – Task Force Co-Chair, former U.S. Attor­ney for the South­ern District of New York, Distin­guished Scholar in Resid­ence at NYU Law
  • Christine Todd Whit­man – Task Force Co-Chair, former Governor of New Jersey, former EPA Admin­is­trator
  • Mike Castle – former Governor of Delaware, former U.S. Repres­ent­at­ive from Delaware 
  • Chris­topher Edley, Jr. – the William H. Orrick, Jr. Distin­guished Professor at U.C. Berke­ley School of Law and former Dean of the school, former senior policy and budget expert under Pres­id­ents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clin­ton
  • Chuck Hagel – former Secret­ary of Defense, former U.S. Senator from Nebraska 
  • David Iglesias – Director of the Wheaton Center for Faith, Polit­ics, and Econom­ics; former U.S. Attor­ney for the District of New Mexico; former team leader, spokes­per­son, and senior prosec­utor with the U.S. Milit­ary Commis­sions 
  • Amy Comstock Rick – Pres­id­ent and CEO of the Food and Drug Law Insti­tute, former Director of the U.S. Office of Govern­ment Ethics, former Asso­ci­ate Coun­sel in the White House Coun­sel’s office 
  • Donald Verrilli – Part­ner at Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, former Soli­citor General of the United States 

The task force’s report, released today, on scientific integ­rity and the exec­ut­ive branch hiring process is avail­able in full here.

More inform­a­tion on the task force is avail­able here