Skip Navigation
Archive

NYPD Targeting of New York Muslims Continues

The NYPD is still infiltrating mosques and other community spaces, coercing informants to spy on their own communities, and adhering to a misguided theory of ‘conveyor-belt radicalization’ to identify potential terrorists.

  • Meghan Koushik
August 20, 2014

In a speech to Muslim community lead­ers last month, Mayor Bill de Blasio lauded the disband­ment of the NYPD’s infam­ous Demo­graph­ics Unit as a sign of progress in his admin­is­tra­tion’s efforts to increase cooper­a­tion between Muslim communit­ies and law enforce­ment, call­ing reli­gious profil­ing ‘unfair’ and ‘coun­ter­pro­duct­ive.’  At face value, these remarks may herald progress. But a closer exam­in­a­tion suggests a more troub­ling pattern. NYPD officers are still infilt­rat­ing mosques and other community spaces, coer­cing inform­ants to spy on their own communit­ies, and adher­ing to a misguided theory of ‘con­veyor-belt radic­al­iz­a­tion’ to identify poten­tial terror­ists. Despite De Blasio’s posit­ive rhet­oric on build­ing part­ner­ships and community outreach and Commis­sioner Brat­ton’s pledge to improve rela­tions between law enforce­ment and minor­ity communit­ies, the pair’s first year on the job has not led to any signi­fic­ant over­hauls in NYPD oper­a­tional policy.

On a basic level, the NYPD still adheres to its intern­ally developed 2007 report, “Radic­al­iz­a­tion in the West,” which theor­izes that deep­en­ing Islamic reli­gious convic­tions are inher­ently correl­ated with a rising propensity to viol­ence. Its logic considers any activ­it­ies asso­ci­ated with Islamic prac­tices — from grow­ing a beard to congreg­at­ing at hookah bars — to be suspi­cious. Essen­tially, anyone who parti­cip­ates in Muslim community activ­it­ies can be a suspect. Despite being empir­ic­ally disproven, the NYPD still refuses to disavow the report, and its rhet­oric is used as justi­fic­a­tion for several ongo­ing oper­a­tions target­ing the Muslim community.   

The NYPD’s grow­ing reli­ance on inform­ants has contin­ued to perpetu­ate the atmo­sphere of suspi­cion and distrust within the Muslim community. In May, a New York Times article revealed that the NYPD’s ‘City­wide Debrief­ing Team’ combed through lists of arrest records for people with plaus­ibly Arab or South Asian ethnic back­grounds brought in on minor viol­a­tions with the specific purpose of turn­ing them into inform­ants. They were reportedly told to bait fellow Muslims through conver­sa­tion and provide the NYPD with docu­ment­a­tion of these encoun­ters. Over a thou­sand New York­ers were ‘inter­viewed’ through the program in 2013 alone. De Blasio said he would ‘reserve judg­ment’ on the contro­ver­sial program, reaf­firm­ing his admin­is­tra­tion’s commit­ment to estab­lish­ing an ‘appro­pri­ate balance between secur­ity and civil liber­ties’.

The NYPD’s use of inform­ants faced sharp criti­cism in an extens­ive report from Human Rights Watch, which docu­mented a pattern of the police target­ing vulner­able people, includ­ing those with phys­ical and mental limit­a­tions in coun­terter­ror­ism prosec­u­tions. The report docu­mented several cases wherein law enforce­ment officers, through inform­ants, essen­tially created a plot, supplied the resources to imple­ment it, and coerced vulner­able Muslim-Amer­ican targets into compli­city. A recent HBO docu­ment­ary “The Newburgh Sting” docu­ments a case where an FBI inform­ant provided four New York men with weapons and a prom­ised $250,000 reward to plan attacks on a US milit­ary base and local synagogues. All four men were convicted, and the judge ruling in the case later commen­ted that the govern­ment had created a terror­ist out of a man “whose buffoon­ery was posit­ively Shakespearean in scope.”

Addi­tion­ally, the NYPD still desig­nates entire mosques ‘ter­ror­ist enter­prises’, a title that essen­tially gives police full reign to invest­ig­ate anyone with a tenu­ous connec­tion to the mosque, includ­ing imams and congreg­ants. Several terror­ist enter­prise invest­ig­a­tions have gone on for over a decade, despite the fact that the NYPD has never actu­ally charged a mosque with any sort of crim­inal activ­ity. As a candid­ate, de Blasio tweeted in response to the incid­ent “deeply troubled NYPD has labelled entire mosques & Muslim orgs terror groups with seem­ingly no leads. Secur­ity AND liberty make us strong.”

In short, there is a wide gap between de Blasio’s spoken inten­tions and the policy decisions of Brat­ton’s police depart­ment. New York’s Muslim community needs more than plat­it­udes. If de Blasio’s admin­is­tra­tion truly wants to part­ner in the fight for Muslims’ civil liber­ties, it must focus its atten­tion beyond what it has already accom­plished and move ahead onto the chal­lenges that remain. Recon­sid­er­ing the frame­work for New York law enforce­ment’s oper­at­ing proced­ures would be a signi­fic­ant step ahead in build­ing a product­ive rela­tion­ship between law enforce­ment and Muslim communit­ies. 

(Photo: Flickr)