Skip Navigation
  • Home
  • Our Work
  • Analysis & Opinion
  • Ohio Voters Ask Court to Compel Redistricting Commission to Appear in Open Court and Explain Refusal to Draw Constitutional Maps
Press Release

Ohio Voters Ask Court to Compel Redistricting Commission to Appear in Open Court and Explain Refusal to Draw Constitutional Maps

Commission defied sixth court-ordered deadline to draw new legislative district plan; petitioners demand explanation in open court.

June 8, 2022
Contact: Romario R. Ricketts, Media Contact, rickettsr@brennan.law.nyu.edu, 646-925-8734

Today peti­tion­ers in Ohio Organ­iz­ing Collab­or­at­ive v. Ohio Redis­trict­ing Commis­sion joined a motion filed by the Bennett petitioners with the Ohio Supreme Court that asks the court to enforce its May 25 order to produce constitutionally compliant legislative maps and to schedule a show cause hearing. The Ohio Organizing Collaborative petitioners filed a motion emphasizing the need for the commissioners to appear in open court for a hearing where they must explain why they have refused to follow the court’s orders. The commissioners failed on June 3 to meet a sixth court-issued deadline to draw a new general assembly district plan.

Yurij Rudensky, senior counsel in the Democracy Program at Bren­nan Center for Justice at NYU Law, had the following comment:

“The Ohio Redistricting Commission has behaved as if it is above the law. It isn’t. It has been reconvened by the Ohio Supreme Court to fix constitutional violations, which means the Court dictates the schedule, not the commission. The commissioners must explain the reasons they have refused to do their job and what they will do to draw district maps that meet Ohio’s constitutional standards.”

Brian Sutherland, part­ner at Reed Smith, had the following comment:

“The commis­sion has been treating the court’s orders as voluntary, which undermines basic principles of checks and balances. The commission doesn’t get to choose when or if to follow the law. The people of Ohio deserve to hear from the commissioners themselves, in open court, why they have refused to follow the Ohio Supreme Court’s orders and the state constitution.”

The Bren­nan Center for Justice at NYU Law and Reed Smith repres­ent peti­tion­ers Ohio Organ­iz­ing Collab­or­at­ive, CAIR-Ohio, Ohio Envir­on­mental Coun­cil, Ahmad Aboukar, Crys­tal Bryant, Samuel Gresham Jr., Pren­tiss Haney, Mikayla Lee, and Pier­rette “Petee” Talley.

Both motions and more filings and back­ground on Ohio Organ­iz­ing Collab­or­at­ive v. Ohio Redis­trict­ing Commis­sion are avail­able here.

This press release is also available here.

Resources