Analysis

The Roberts Court’s past rulings have had devastating consequences for voters of color. This one will too.

His tenure has included multiple ethics scandals, as well as votes that helped roll back voting rights and ushered in unlimited corporate spending on elections.

In decimating one of the most sacred and popular pieces of legislation in American history, Justice Samuel Alito quotes himself. 

The Court’s conservative majority used outdated examples to say the racial gap in voter turnout has closed, but in reality, the gap is growing.

Term limits for justices, a binding ethics code, and cameras in the courtroom are just a few of the reforms Congress should adopt. 

Our modern gerrymandering nightmare is the fault of the Roberts Court, which lacked the guts to do its most important job.

In the past few weeks, two Supreme Court justices offered comments that were greeted with outrage and condemnation.

Leaked memos show that the Supreme Court’s emergency docket is rife with double standards. 

Voters are the losers without national limits on partisan gerrymandering.

The state supreme court’s decision asserted judicial authority at a moment when courts’ independence has been under assault across the country.