Analysis

In a victory for voters, a federal judge struck down a provision that chilled voter outreach efforts by community organizations that assist voters.

The U.S. Supreme Court should follow the example of 49 states, where justices don’t serve life terms.

Unfounded in both history and legal precedent, the decision poses a risk to our system of governance.

Election officials bring expertise in election administration and law, while campus stakeholders — including administration, students, and student groups — possess a deep understanding of their communities and know the best ways to engage them.

Attempts to cast doubt on the reliability of the numbers don’t hold up.

Partisans are trying to undermine the vote count in key states.

The chilling effect it created continues to threaten American primacy in science and technology. 

While Michigan made it easier to release results quickly, other key states refused to change outdated restrictions or erected new hurdles.

There are surprising new details in the Court’s big favor for Trump.

Candidates in Arizona are relying heavily on national donors and super PACs, weakening constituents’ influence.