Brennan Center Research

Recent publications from the Brennan Center include The New Politics of Judicial Elections and How Judicial Elections Impact Criminal Cases.

June 6, 2016

Judicial Selection

  • How Judicial Elections Impact Criminal Cases (2015) — Pressures of upcoming re-election campaigns make judges more punitive toward defendants in criminal cases, according to a growing body of empirical research.
     
  • Judicial Retention in Hawaii: A Case Study (2016) -- This analysis looks at the use of nominating commissions for judicial retention, a system which is unique to Hawaii. It finds that many of its features help promote a nonpartisan and independent judiciary, but that it could be improved by increased transparency. 
  • Judicial Selection: A Look at California (2017) -- This analysis looks at California's judicial appointment system, and finds that while this method is effective in California, it may not have sufficient built-in safeguards to successfully export the model to other jurisdictions. 

Judicial Diversity

  • Improving Judicial Diversity (2009) — This study examines how successful states with appointed judiciaries are at recruiting and appointing women and racial minorities to sit on the bench, aiming to provide an accurate picture of the diversity in state courts and a roadmap of how to improve diversity on the state bench.

Judicial Recusal

  • Fair Courts: Setting Recusal Standards (2008) — This paper focuses on how judges, courts, legislators, and litigants can maximize the due process protection that stronger recusal rules potentially afford, offering ten proposals to strengthen the fairness and legitimacy of state recusal systems.

See our resource page for more information on Judicial Refusal Reform.