Jump to navigation

Home

Brennan Center for Justice

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • RSS
Donate

Search form

Main Menu With Nesting

  • Issues
    • Voting Rights & Elections
    • Money in Politics
    • Government & Court Reform
    • Justice for All
    • Liberty & National Security
  • Advocacy
    • Policy Proposals
    • Court Cases
    • Legislation
    • New Constitutional Vision
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Analysis
    • Statements & Testimony
    • Commentary
  • Media
    • Media Center
    • Press Releases
    • Multimedia
    • Newsletters
    • Blog
    • In the News
    • Experts
    • Events
  • Experts
    • Experts
    • Fellows
  • Blog
  • About
    • About Us
    • 2013 Brennan Legacy Awards Dinner
    • Celebrating Justice Brennan
    • Board of Directors
    • Program Advisory Board
    • Staff
    • Programs
    • Events
    • Get Involved
    • Employment
    • Donate
    • Contact Us

You are here

  1. Home ›

Rothgery v. Gillespie County, Texas (Amicus Brief)

View
June 23, 2008
Reducing Mass Incarceration

On June 23, 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Constitution's
requirement of a right to counsel in the case of Walter
Allen Rothgery v. Gillespie County, Texas. 
The ruling held under the Sixth Amendment that a person charged with
a crime must be provided with counsel at the time of the initial arraignment—when
the government first presents its charges against the defendant before a court
of law—even if a prosecutor is not involved in that proceeding.

"We are pleased the Court recognized that the while the prosecution is
making up its mind, the government cannot indefinitely delay the appointment of
free counsel required by the constitution," said David Udell, the Director of
the Justice Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, which filed an
amicus brief in the case along with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational
Fund and the National Legal Aid and Defender Association.  "By endorsing the bright-line rule that currently
operates in 43 states, the court has done everyone a service.  The alternative—appointing counsel only
after the prosecutors decide to push a case forward—would be unworkable, as
well as oppressive." 

Walter Rothgery had been arrested, arraigned, and then released on bail
until a formal indictment prompted his re-arrest, increased his bail, and put
him behind bars, where he stayed for three weeks until a lawyer—one was finally
appointed for him a full six months after the arraignment—reduced his bail,
enabling him to leave the jail.  The
lawyer then showed the prosecutor that the charges against Rothgery were
erroneous, causing the prosecutor to dismiss the case.  Had a lawyer been appointed at the first
arraignment, Rothgery would probably never have gone to jail.

  • Issues
    • Voting Rights & Elections
    • Money in Politics
    • Government & Court Reform
    • Justice for All
    • Liberty & National Security
  • Advocacy
    • Court Cases
    • Policy Proposals
    • Legislation
    • New Constitutional Vision
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Analysis
    • Statements & Testimony
    • Commentary
  • Media
    • Media Center
    • Press Releases
    • Multimedia
    • Newsletters
    • Blog
    • News
    • Events
    • Experts
  • About
    • About Us
    • 2013 Brennan Legacy Awards Dinner
    • Celebrating Justice Brennan
    • Board of Directors
    • Program Advisory Board
    • Staff
    • Programs
    • Events
    • Get Involved
    • Employment
    • Donate
    • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Donate
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Photo Credits

Search form