Madison v. Washington
Madison v. Washington
Voting After Criminal Conviction
The Brennan Center filed an amicus brief in Madison v. Washington, a case challenging a state law that prevents people with felony convictions who cannot pay their legal financial obligations from regaining their right to vote. The Center filed the brief with the Washington Supreme Court in support of plaintiffs/respondents and on behalf of itself, several civil rights organizations and three Washington minority bar associations.
Madison v. Washington challenges the provision of Washington’s felony disenfranchisement statute which conditions the restoration of voting rights on a person’s full payment of all court-ordered fees, fines, and restitution associated with a felony conviction (called legal financial obligations or “LFOs"). Plaintiffs, represented by the ACLU of Washington, contend that the state’s law illegally conditions the right to vote on a person’s ability to pay and therefore violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution and the privileges and immunities clause of the Washington constitution.
In effect, the challenged provision leads to the permanent disenfranchisement of people who are unable to pay off their LFOs. For instance, plaintiff Beverly DuBois is unable to work due to a permanent disability and now lives on food stamps and monthly disability payments. On her fixed income, Ms. Dubois cannot afford monthly payments sufficient to cover even the interest that accrues on her LFOs, so that her total debt continues to increase even as she makes the required payments. Under Washington’s system, individuals like Ms. DuBois will never regain their right to vote.
In March 2006, the King County Superior Court of Washington struck down the provision which conditions the right to vote on the payment of LFOs. The state appealed the decision, and the case was heard by the Washington Supreme Court on June 27, 2006.
The Brennan Center brief argues that Washington’s felony disenfranchisement law is one of the harshest in the nation, and thus in the world. The brief reviews national and international laws and criminal disenfranchisement rates, summarizes the history of racial discrimination that taints the practice in this country, reveals the law’s disparate impact on the state’s minority communities, and argues that wealth qualifications for voting are unconstitutional.
Press Center
- Washington State Supreme Court to Hear Landmark Case Addressing Voting Rights of People with Felony Convictions (June 22, 2006)
Rulings
- Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (March 27, 2006)
- Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (December 8, 2005)
- Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion (December 21, 2005)
- Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants’ Cross-Motion (January 6, 2006)
- Defendants’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment (January 12, 2006)
- Brief of Appellants State of Washington, et al. in the Washington Supreme Court (May 16, 2006)
- Brief of Respondents Madison, et al. in the Washington Supreme Court (May 30, 2006)
Amicus Briefs
- Brief of amici curiae Brennan Center for Justice, et al. (May 26, 2006)
- Brief of amici curiae Justice Works, et al. (May 30, 2006)
- Brief of amici curiae League of Women Voters of Washington, et al. (May 24, 2006)
