The jurisprudence developed by a five-justice majority on the Roberts Court is doing major damage to efforts to rein in the influence of moneyed interests in our politics.
Mark Ladov testifies before the New York City Campaign Finance Board with recommendations for improving draft rules concerning disclosure of independent expenditures.
This report details how special interest "Super Spenders" threatened impartial justice and emboldened unprecedented legislative attacks on America's courts.
Just like the executives and big-league scouts in “Moneyball” who misread the baseball market by focusing on outdated statistics, political pundits breaking down the latest presidential fundraising figures are looking at the wrong numbers.
Judicial elections are different than legislative races, which is why North Carolina should maintain and strengthen its judicial public financing program as a vital bulwark against improper influence.
