Campbell v. Bysiewicz
Campbell v. Bysiewicz
Voting Rights & Elections
The Center represented, among others, a Connecticut congressional candidate, a state assembly candidate, and a state senate candidate in a challenge to Connecticut’s primary ballot access laws. Connecticut’s system insulated incumbents from challenges within the party. In August 2002, after a favorable district court ruling, the Second Circuit ruled that Connecticut’s primary system should continue under the old rules for the current election cycle and stayed a lower court’s injunction. However, in January 2003, after the Center filed new motions for summary judgment, a federal district court judge declared Connecticut’s primary ballot access system unconstitutional and permanently enjoined its enforcement. The court ruled in favor of opening the State’s primary elections to more candidates.
Featured Content
(For a full list of related content, refer to the right column sidebar.)
Press Center
- Press Release: Connecticut’s Primary Ballot Access System Declared Unconstitutional (Jan.2030, 2003)
- Statement by Plaintiffs’ Counsel on Second Circuit Ruling (Aug. 9, 2002)
- Statement by Brennan Center on Modified Decision (Aug. 5, 2002)
- Statement on Initial Decision by U.S. District Judge Peter Dorsey (July 23, 2002)
- Press Release: Filing of Lawsuit Seeking to Open Connecticut’s Primaries to More Candidates (March 21, 2002)
