Judicial Advertising
Judicial candidates, political parties, and interest groups have increasingly invested in television advertising to influence campaigns for the bench. During each election cycle since 2000, the Center has studied and published reports on the sources, costs, and content of those advertisements. We post video and storyboards of the ads, as well as weekly election-season press releases with analyses of the data and campaign commentary. We also analyzed television advertising about the nominees for U.S. Supreme Court in 2005.
There are no Court Cases for this category. You can browse all Court Cases here.
Heck—Right to Take WI Legislature to Task
In his Capital Times op-ed, Jay Heck takes shots at Wisconsin’s legislature for failing to act on a campaign finance reform bill, and accuses the group of quietly, “smothering it with a pillow”....
Certain American values transcend partisan divisions. One is that money should not influence the courts. But with record sums pouring into judicial elections, the ideal of due process is giving way to a perception of pay-to-play justice…
BC Proposal Offers Fresh Ideas and Reforms to End the Growing Threat to Judicial Impartiality
In an effort to restore trust in our justice system, the Brennan Center for Justice has published a new report that seeks to eliminate even the appearance of an imbalanced judiciary with consistent principles and rules for when a judge should step down from a case.
Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Raises New Questions About Judicial Election Reform
An African American justice on the Wisconsin Supreme Court lost his bid for re-election Tuesday in a racially charged and interest group-dominated campaign that raises new questions about the role of money in judicial campaigns.
There are no Legislation & Testimony for this category. You can browse all Legislation & Testimony here.
Wisconsin State Court, Butler Ad, Mar. 3, 2008
Ad from Wisconsin State Supreme Court race. Ad features Justice Louis Butler.
Certain American values transcend partisan divisions. One is that money should not influence the courts. But with record sums pouring into judicial elections, the ideal of due process is giving way to a perception of pay-to-play justice.