Filibuster

Introduction to Senate Dysfunction

Over the last decade, it has become increasingly evident that Senate procedures have been used to prevent decision-making rather than to promote deliberation and debate. The threat of a filibuster — coupled with a 60-vote requirement to force any substantive vote — has affected nearly every action in the Senate during the last several years, under both Republican and Democratic majorities. As a result, the Senate has effectively ceased operating as the majoritarian institution our founders intended for it to be; instead, a supermajority vote is almost always needed to pass legislative or approve executive branch or judicial nominees.

Recently, this troubling trend has reached a breaking point — we are now dealing with a difference in degree that has become a difference in kind. Throughout the 1990s, there were, on average, about 29 filibusters per congressional session. This number is ever increasing: there were 32 filibusters in the 107th Congress, 27 in the 108th, and 36 in the 109th. In the 110th Congress, there were approximately 52 filibusters — a 44 percent spike from the prior session. The current Senate hit its “golden” 50th filibuster in mid-April of this year

More, with rising partisanship, the minority party has assumed near-unbreakable veto power over legislative action, bringing the chamber virtually to a halt. Even routine diplomatic nominations and noncontroversial measures are routinely derailed. Many fear that the Senate is perilously close to total breakdown.

This dysfunction is unlikely to correct itself without exposure, awareness and remedial action. If our democratic processes are to be used as the Founders intended — to address and resolve the pressing problems of our nation on behalf of our country’s citizens — we must find solutions to repair this broken part of our system immediately.

Accordingly, in January 2010, the Brennan Center has launched a special, year-long project to address procedural dysfunction in the U.S. Senate. Our ultimate goal is to restore legislative accountability in the Senate by reforming the rules that currently incentivize relentless and unprincipled obstruction. New rules should facilitate actual debate, deliberation and compromise — reflecting the intent of our Founders and allowing the Senate to effectively address the pressing demands of Twenty-First century America. This goal reinforces the Brennan Center’s core mission — to promote a robust and functioning democracy.

Mimi Marziani, with a Foreword by Susan Liss

There are no Court Cases for this category. You can browse all Court Cases here.

Filibuster Report Shows Increased Government Gridlock

The use of the filibuster to create gridlock in the Senate has increased drastically over the past two decades, according to a new report.

Mimi Murray Digby Marziani

The Not-So Nuclear Option

By using the so-called "Nuclear Option," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid certainly showed some chutzpah. But what happened was not revolutionary — indeed, it was not even unprecedented. 

What’s to Blame for Senate Obstruction?

While the recent Senate rules reforms are modest, they are important steps to ensure the Senate is a functioning, legislating body. But what comes next?

More Blog Entries

Illustrations by Risko

There are no Press Releases for this category. You can browse all Press Releases here.

Testimony of Mimi Marziani on the Filibuster: Legislative Proposals to Change Senate Procedure

In this testimony presented before the U.S. Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, Mimi Marziani gives the relevant historical background to provide context for the modern-day filibuster debate.  She illustrates that ever since the Senate has perceived the filibuster as a problem, there has been robust support for the position that a majority of senators can effect rules change at the start of a new Congress.

Testimony of Mimi Marziani and Diana Lee Examining the Filibuster

On June 23, 2010 Mimi Marziani and Diana Lee provided the U.S. Senate Committee on Rules and Administration with testimony  examining silent filibusters, holds and the senate confirmation process.

Testimony for the Senate Rules Committee on the Modern Filibuster

The modern filibuster devalues the Senate, disrupts Congress, and threatens to derail our government. This testimony, submitted to the Senate Rules Committee, elaborates.

More Legislation & Testimony

Filibuster Reform’s Small Steps

With the start of a new session, the time was ripe for the Senate to reform its archaic procedural rules and curb obstruction – to do something about rampant filibuster abuse. It has apparently missed its opportunity for real reform.

Filibusted! A Conversation With Greg Koger

Greg Koger, Author,Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate, talks to Just Books' Mimi Marziani about the filibuster — and its use and misssue.

Remarks Delivered by Mimi Marziani at Netroots Nation

On July 24, 2010 Brennan Center Counsel Mimi Marziani addressed a session at Netroots Nation in Las Vegas entitled the Filibuster and Senate Reform.

More Analysis & Commentary