Detention & Habeas Corpus
In the aftermath of 9/11, the Bush administration authorized the wholesale detention of individuals suspected of terrorism. While in executive detention, which is often shrouded in secrecy, prisoners have been forbidden access to due process of the law and fair judicial review. Despite the fact that habeas corpus is a constitutionally protected law that allows the imprisoned to question the grounds for their detention, the government has denied these individuals this right.
The
The Center and three other organizations submitted an amicus brief on October 31, 2008, urging the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to affirm the D.C. District Court’s decision to release 17 Uighurs currently detained unlawfully at Guantánamo Bay into the U.S.
The Brennan Center filed an amicus brief in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of a group of distinguished federal judges in support of Maher Arar, a Canadian who was subject to extraordinary rendition to Syria.
The Center is defending a Qatari national detained as an “enemy combatant” in the United States. Mr. al-Marri has been imprisoned without trial and without due process since 2003. The U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled arguments in Mr. al-Marri’s case for April 27. A separate, ongoing case is challenging Mr. al-Marri’s conditions of confinement.
Uighur Release is Welcome, but Leaves Fate of Remaining Detainees Uncertain
Now that Bermuda and Palau have offered to resettle the Guantánamo Uighurs, what will happen to the rest of the detainees?
Grading the Obama Administration
Government transparency is vital to a free and well-functioning democracy, and it is particularly so in the area of national security....
Obama’s State Secrets Claims Face Mounting Opposition from Courts, Advocates
President Barack Obama has drawn praise, but his use of the “state secrets” privilege to squash lawsuits on torture and surveillance is drawing mounting opposition....
Illustrations by Risko
Bermuda Accepts Detainees as U.S. Starts Dismantling Guantanamo
The Brennan Center welcomes the Burmudan government’s decision to resettle four Guantánamo Uighurs.
Executive Privilege System Broken, Report Finds
Center proposes new legislation to resolve executive privilege disputes.
On Transparency, Obama Succeeds and Disappoints in First 100 Days
Detailed 30-Page Report Card reveals Obama’s need to improve accountability in cases of government misconduct.
Investigating Violations of the Rule of Law in Counter-Terrorism Policy
Proposal for an independent commission to investigate any violations.
Emily Berman’s Statement for the Record for Hearing on Torture and the Office of Legal Counsel
Emily Berman submitted a Statement for the Record regarding the most troubling legal deficiences in the three May 2005 memoranda issued by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel to the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts.
Frederick A.O. Schwarz Jr. Before Hearing on “Truth Commission”
Testimony in support of a nonpartisan, independent commission of inquiry. Delivered before Senator Leahy’s hearing, “Getting to the Truth Through a Nonpartisan Commission of Inquiry”
Essay in the New Republic explores if Pres. Obama will change his heart on a key rule-of-law issue.
Transparency in the First 100 Days: A Report Card
Detailed 30-Page report card reveals Obama’s need to improve accountability in cases of government misconduct.
Transparency in the First 100 Days | Secret Law
Detailed 30-Page report card reveals Obama’s need to improve accountability in cases of government misconduct. This page offers detailed analysis and recommendations.

