Signup for email updates
Making Judicial Recusal More Rigorous
Of the emerging threats to judicial impartiality, perhaps most fundamental is the influence of money.Related Publications
Related Blog Entries
- Impartiality Still an Issue After WV Judge’s Riviera Scandal
– 05/15/08 - Justice For Sale
– 03/22/08 - “Stupid” Bluntness
– 01/22/08 - Judicial Campaign Contribution Quid Fails to Produce Quo
– 12/13/07
Related Court Cases
Related Press Releases
- Coalition Urges Supreme Court to Review West Virginia Case
– 08/04/08 - Harman Mining Company (W. Virginia recusal case)
– 05/15/08 - BC Proposal Offers Fresh Ideas and Reforms to End the Growing Threat to Judicial Impartiality
– 04/07/08 - Plaintiff’s Counsel on Supreme Court Decision in Lopez Torres v. NYS Board of Elections
– 01/16/08
Related Commentary
- Justice for Sale
– 03/22/08 - The Best Defense: Why Elected Courts Should Lead Recusal Reform
– 06/01/07 - In Judicial Elections, Due Process Is Paramount
– 04/29/02 - Second-Guessing the Supreme Court
– 10/08/01
Related Analysis
Home | About Us | Get Involved | Employment | Terms of Service | Contact Us | Privacy | Site Map
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law | 161 Avenue of the Americas, 12th Floor | New York, NY 10013
212.998.6730 phone | 212.995.4550 fax | brennancenter@nyu.edu
Washington, D.C. office | 1730 M Street, NW, Suite 413 | Washington, D.C. 20036
202.785.4747 phone | 202.785.4744 fax | brennancenter@nyu.edu