Signup for email updates
Constitutional Analysis of South Dakota’s 2006 “JAIL for Judges” Proposed Amendment
Related Publications
Related Blog Entries
- Impartiality Still an Issue After WV Judge’s Riviera Scandal
– 05/15/08 - Justice For Sale
– 03/22/08 - “Stupid” Bluntness
– 01/22/08 - Judicial Campaign Contribution Quid Fails to Produce Quo
– 12/13/07
Related Court Cases
Related Press Releases
- Harman Mining Company (W. Virginia recusal case)
– 05/15/08 - BC Proposal Offers Fresh Ideas and Reforms to End the Growing Threat to Judicial Impartiality
– 04/07/08 - Plaintiff’s Counsel on Supreme Court Decision in Lopez Torres v. NYS Board of Elections
– 01/16/08 - Ruling Today In Watson and Raab
– 06/10/03
Related Commentary
- Justice for Sale
– 03/22/08 - The Best Defense: Why Elected Courts Should Lead Recusal Reform
– 06/01/07 - In Judicial Elections, Due Process Is Paramount
– 04/29/02 - Second-Guessing the Supreme Court
– 10/08/01
Related Analysis
- Hugh M. Caperton et al. v. A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc., et al. - Petition for Writ of Certiorari
– 07/03/08 - Summaries of Relevant Cases Decided Since Republican Party of Minnesota v. White
- Constitutional Analysis of South Dakota’s 2006 “JAIL for Judges” Proposed Amendment
– 12/15/05 - Chart Summarizing the Judicial Canons in All 50 States
Home | About Us | Get Involved | Employment | Terms of Service | Contact Us | Privacy | Site Map
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law | 161 Avenue of the Americas, 12th Floor | New York, NY 10013
212.998.6730 phone | 212.995.4550 fax | brennancenter@nyu.edu
Washington, D.C. office | 1730 M Street, NW, Suite 413 | Washington, D.C. 20036
202.785.4747 phone | 202.785.4744 fax | brennancenter@nyu.edu